<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Goal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rangerramblings.com/2007/04/30/the-goal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rangerramblings.com/2007/04/30/the-goal/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on the Blueshirts by a Rangers columnist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Distinct Kicking Motion</title>
		<link>http://www.rangerramblings.com/2007/04/30/the-goal/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>A Distinct Kicking Motion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 05:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rangerramblings.com/?p=44#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of booting, tonight it&#8217;s all about whether or not the puck was really over the goal line.  A different video review result may have made a big change in the series, but hey, inconclusive means no change from the on-ice call. This &#8220;controversy&#8221; (the sports shows need something to talk about) follows a different Rangers-Sabres video review that everyone was talking about yesterday, where an apparent goal by Marcel Hossa was disallowed due to a distinct kicking motion. (I watched the play over and over, and to me it was not a goal &#8212; just recently the Sharks had a goal disallowed for the same reason, and it was even less obvious in the Sharks&#8217; case.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking of booting, tonight it&#8217;s all about whether or not the puck was really over the goal line.  A different video review result may have made a big change in the series, but hey, inconclusive means no change from the on-ice call. This &#8220;controversy&#8221; (the sports shows need something to talk about) follows a different Rangers-Sabres video review that everyone was talking about yesterday, where an apparent goal by Marcel Hossa was disallowed due to a distinct kicking motion. (I watched the play over and over, and to me it was not a goal &#8212; just recently the Sharks had a goal disallowed for the same reason, and it was even less obvious in the Sharks&#8217; case.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

